IS THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RUNNING OUT OF WATER?

If you attend any of the JCWSA meetings you may be led to believe that the City of Monticello is in desperate need of water.

JCWSA member, Ken McMichael has questioned the city of Monticello’s water capabilities in three meetings.  After the January JCWSA meeting the City sent a letter to the JCWSA stating their water sources and to “lessen the concerns” of JCWSA members.

Citywater013013At the March meeting, Mr. McMichael again gave his reasons as to why the City did not have enough water and ignored the details in the letter.

JCWSA says they have a longer term perspective than the City.

Frank Sherrill, JCWSA engineer, was at the May JCWSA meeting and gave a presentation about the possible well sites in the Cedar Creek area. His plan was to have JCWSA buy options on each site and then purchase a 1 acre site around the well if they produced water.  He said if any of them panned out that JCWSA could possibly “sell water to the City at a cheaper rate than the City could produce it.”  He also mentioned “helping the City out” and the good quality of the water that would come out of the wells.

Each well option would cost approximately $15,000, but no one that owns the land where these sites are located has expressed much interest.  Looking at the sites on the map, it would be difficult to sell only 1 acre of the large plot of land without ruining the future use of all the land.  It was not discussed as to where the $15,000 per well option would come from.  (This map is produced from memory of the presentation.  The well site on the far left may be further down into the same parcel with the 2nd from the left site.)  The parcel highlighted is the parcel JCWSA seems most interested in.

JCWSAWellSitesJCWSA has long had money problems and have just borrowed more money from the Bank of Monticello so they could pay off a long outstanding loan from the Butts Co WSA.  At a recent BOC meeting, Mark Walton of JCWSA, presented the BOC with another “bill” showing how much JCWSA says the county owes them.   This bill was over $94,000 and included both the 2009 amount ($42,982 that was not approved by the BOC) and the 2013 bill that will be billed by the Tax Commissioner in July ($41,896).

The BOC approved a “Fire District Tax” to help JCWSA pay for  hydrant maintenance a few years ago.  People along the water lines pay a tax of approximately $23 per year that is on their tax bill.  This will be discussed at the next BOC where the rate will be set for the next tax bill.  The rate last year was set to bring in $46,266.  The additional money (above what is “owed”) is to pay the back amounts due–this according to both Mr. Salmon and Mr. Trammell that served on the JCWSA–when a new, higher rate was approved by the BOC.  However, this tax revenue has not stopped JCWSA from billing the county and trying to get the BOC to pay out more money.

See discussion of fire district tax rate here at the 5/13/13 BOC meeting.

Setting JCWSA fire district tax

Is a higher rate going to be approved to pay for wells to help supply the City?  Does the City need extra water?  Are the hydrants being maintained with the money collected?  How much more debt is JCWSA considering adding? These are questions that should be answered at the joint BOC /JCWSA meeting on May 21 at 6:30PM.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in City, Water. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to IS THE CITY OF MONTICELLO RUNNING OUT OF WATER?

  1. gay morrison says:

    I find this interesting. Why does the JCWSA continue to think the tax payers should pay this bill. The office of the tax commissioner owes them the money collected as a tax, granted. By insisting the BOC owes this money is double taxing the taxpayer who has already paid and taxing a taxpayer that does not owe the tax. I wish I understood why they can not understand. I have concerns about having two commissioners that are so heavily involved with the JCWSA. I get a feeling we are doomed to be over taxed due to them being on the BOC.

    I also do not understand why they can not take we do not need their water as WE DO NOT NEED YOUR WATER. What part of that letter do they not understand? The JCWSA is like a bad recurring nightmare that just keeps on and on

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s